Pablo Povarchik
I work at the moment where AI decisions quietly stop being reversible.
Most AI failures don’t begin with bad models or broken code.
They begin earlier — when a demo works, language shifts, and a decision is effectively made before anyone notices it has happened.
My work is focused on making that moment visible.
What this site is
This is not a portfolio. Not a consultancy brochure. Not a collection of opinions about AI.
It is a working record of how AI initiatives actually harden into commitments — often before implementation, accountability, or risk are explicit.
The material here exists to surface:
- Where evaluation quietly turns into commitment
- How optionality collapses without a formal decision
- Why reversibility disappears long before code exists
How the work shows up
Sometimes this takes the form of written artifacts — specifications, field notes, or analytical frameworks.
Sometimes it takes the form of a direct intervention: a bounded read on a live situation before momentum makes correction expensive.
What it is not:
- No implementation services
- No “delivery support”
- No roadmaps by default
- No implied build phase
Selected work
- Before the Code Exists, a Decision Is Already Made — field notes
- System Initialization Specification — how interaction structure precedes output
- Cognitive Leverage Operators — thinking under constraint
- AI Iteration Density Theory — when speed changes system behavior
Engagement boundary
I engage selectively, typically when:
- A decision exists but is not yet explicit
- A demo has succeeded and questions have stopped
- Commitment is forming without shared clarity
The work is intentionally bounded. Its purpose is clarity — not momentum.